Tolerant Teaching
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Dear School District Down the Road
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Thursday, October 27, 2011
New Teachers
The first article was from Education Week in which a teacher relates her horror story of being a new teacher. She, an extremely hardworking teacher, wanted to do well for her students. However, because of a flawed system, inadequate mentorship and administrators, she did not succeed. I, like most teachers, have a horror story of my own which, at the end of October seems appropriate.
There were terrible “literature” textbooks; simplified, boring, poorly designed, but NO WRITTEN CURRICULUM. For seasoned teachers having no curriculum to work from might seem like the ultimate freedom, but for a brand spanking new teacher it was a nightmare. There were no other materials and no direction in which to go. I was the only teacher who taught the lowest track course, and none of the other English teachers in the school had taught the course. In addition, no one was really willing to offer help lest they would be required to help teach this lowest track course, the one no one wanted to touch.
This situation forced me to make up every lesson, every unit and every worksheet from scratch. In the days before the internet, this was very time-consuming.
The second course I taught was American Literature – which also had no written curriculum but at least a decent textbook – but I could teach with an excellent, veteran teacher who taught me a lot about fitting the material to the students’ needs.
My classroom was the one in the back corner of the school. It was not even a classroom but a television studio – a black box with curtains – and NO WINDOWS. It was nowhere near the other English classrooms and had no phone. If an emergency had occurred, there would have been no way to contact the office which was on the other side of the school. It was as if they were isolating me from the rest of the school on purpose. There were no affordable cell phones in those days either and only drug-dealing students had pagers.
In addition to the regular teaching load, the principal who hired me expected me to start a drama program from scratch – two plays and a musical a year. The principal had no idea how much work he was asking of me, and being young, energetic and foolish, I accepted the task. The extra-curricular portion of my job – approximately 20 hours of work per week beyond my regular teaching duties – paid $1200.00 per year.
The principal who hired me was to retire that year. My first evaluation from principal one was this: work on discipline. In a school where fights were an hourly occurance and smoke poured from the bathroom, discpline was my fault. I probably wrote too many students up -- causing more work for the office. The next years' principal who 'fired' me by not offering me tenure cited that I had not done anything to remediate my "discipline" issues in the year since my first evaluation. No guidance was given about what to do to remediate those "issues" -- the fights weren't happening in my class; students were, in my opinion, under control. What I was supposed to do to improve was never discussed. I was supposed to improve by magic, clearly.
I could not have succeeded at the first position for which I was hired, for all the tasks I was asked to do. I was not alone; the math teacher who was also hired the same year didn’t receive tenure either.
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Maybe my first FBI file entry?
I respectfully request some clarification on your philosophy/ideology. I know I am not a constituent of yours, but I am a citizen of Wisconsin and a teacher who has read and studied several of Rand's novels. You claim to be a devotee of Ayn Rand (it has been reported in several reputable newspapers that you have your staff read the novel Anthem) and yet you are a member of a Christian church -- a fact that would have appalled Rand -- and you work for the taxpayers of Wisconsin rather than yourself. Getting government paycheck, taxpayer funded healthcare, and a taxpayer funded pension would not have fit Rand's version of Individualism. I know you work hard for these benefits (as I work hard for mine) and I don't mean any disrespect by this inquiry. However, I don't understand how being part of the "socialist/collectivist" construct Rand railed against is being an "individualist". I know that Rand wrote fiction, and much of it was speculative. But it would be interesting to me and to my students to understand which parts of Rand's philosophies you accept and which of them you reject.
Respectfully,
Kristin Lohrentz
Monday, May 9, 2011
Slobby Satire
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Tabatha's Bitch Takeover
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Bitch. Bitch? Bitch!
No matter what, a woman in a position of power will be called a bitch. Repeatedly.
Last week I was (as my kids say) "yelled at" by some random guy on Facebook and told I was a "disgrace to my profession", I didn't care about kids (just myself) and that I "made him want to puke, preferably all over you" because I wanted to "shut down the schools".
In my defense, I have not taken any time off since the protests started, and this was unsolicited abuse. (BTW --somebody needs to tell the tea-party nut- jobs that they aren't the only ones being threatened in this world.)
Friday, I was verbally abused by a student, called a "bitch" and other words that I am too polite to repeat (really—they were that bad – and I was called a "Ginger" wtf?). I have been verbally abused by one or two girls in my career, but most of them had been verbally abused by their fathers and brothers – how do I know this? Because I have met the fathers and brothers and they behaved the same way to me. Boys are, in my experience, 10 times more likely to be verbally abusive.
And today it was reported in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel (a very conservative newspaper I might add) State Supreme Court Justice William Prosser is accused of calling Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson a "bitch" and he also threatened to "destroy her".
My biggest problem with this incident is that Prosser claims that Abrahamson "goaded him into it." Really? In what reality is it okay to:
1. Call your boss a "bitch"
2. Threaten to destroy her
3. Call the Chief Justice a "bitch"
4. Threaten anyone you work with
5. Threaten any human being on the face of the planet? Not even Khaddafi gets away with threats.
So… my point is this. Women are bitches because as Tina Fey says, "Bitches get shit done." But it's not okay to call us "bitches" because it's abusive and stupid and reflects much more poorly on the bitch-er than the bitch-ee.
That. Is. All.